contact :: legal :: webstats  also on this site: - select - home tech writings green business studies conspiracy popular pages welcome  also in this section:  business index  most popular pages  search: Like this site? Your donation is welcome!

reference	case	principle
L-5-330	Adams v. Lindsell	acceptance - postal
RB-136	Ajayi v. Briscoe	promissory estoppel
L-6-090	Associated Newspapers v. Bancks	breach of condition
L-6-230	Balmain New Ferry v. Robertson	exclusion - previous dealings
L-6-260/RB-114	Beswick v. Beswick	privity
L-6-060	Bettini v. Gye	breach of warranty
L-5-180/RB-105	Pharmaceutical Society Of Great Britain v. Boots Cash	invitation to treat - display of goods
L-5-360	Byrne & Co. v. Van Tienhoven	offer - revocation - communication of
L-5-080/RB-102	Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company	intent to create legal relations; advertising - mere advertising puff; offer - unilateral - beyond enticement
L-5-210/RB-103	Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company	acceptance - expressly waived communication of
L-6-200	Cavier v. Browne	exclusion - mere receipt
L-5-090	Cohen v. Cohen	domestic contract; no intent for legal relations
L-6-200	Curtis v. Chemical Cleaning Company	exclusion - mere receipt
RB-158	Dick Bentley Productions	representations
L-5-360	Dickinson v. Dodds	offer - revocation - communication of
RB-113	Dunlop Pneumatic v. Selfridge	privity
L-5-320	Entores Ltd. v. Miles Far East Corporation	acceptance - communication of
L-5-310	Felthouse v. Bindley	acceptance - non-communication of
RB-107	Fisher v. Bell	invitation to treat - display of goods
L-5-480/RB-129	Foakes v. Beer	consideration - reduced
RB-182	Grant v. Australian Knitting Mills	impliedly makes known... (SOGA)
L-5-200/RB-107	Harvey v. Facey	invitation to treat - info provided in the course...
L-5-485	High Trees v. Central London Properties	promissory estoppel - shield
L-6-095	Hong Kong Shipping v. Kawasaki Kisen	material/immaterial breach of an innominate term
L-5-300	Hyde v. Wrench	offer/counter-offer - revival
L-5-410	Lampleigh v. Braithwait	consideration
L-5-250	Masters v. Cameron	conditional assent
L-5-520	McLaughin v. Darcy	valid minors’ contracts
L-5-090	Merritt v. Merritt	domestic contract - intent to create legal relations
L-6-110/RB-160	Moorcock	terms of contract implied by courts
RB-151	Nash v. Inman	void minors’ contracts
L-6-220	Olley v. Marlborough	exclusion - added after contract formed
L-6-020	Oscar Chess v. Williams	representations
L-5-160/RB-105	Partridge v. Crittenden	invitation to treat - advertisements
L-5-230	R v. Clarke	acceptance - in reliance of offer
L-5-370	Ramsgate Victoria v. Montefiore	offer expiry - lapse of time
L-5-060	Rose v. Frank Co.	exclusion - no intent to create legal relations
L-5-300	Stevenson Jacques v. McLean	offer/counter-offer - request for more info
L-6-240	Sydney City Council v. West	exclusion - outside scope of contract
L-5-190/RB-201	Thornton v. Shoe Lane Parking	offer/accept - automatic vending machines
L-6-220	Thornton v. Shoe Lane Parking	exclusion - added after contract formed
L-6-270	Trident Insurance v. McNiece Bros	privity - equity
RB-182	Wallis v. Russell	expressly makes known... (SOGA)
L-5-485	Walton’s Stores v. Maher	promissory estoppel - precontractual agreement
L-5-210	SOGA S.57(2)	auctions - offers
RB-198	SOGA S.11(2)	conditions - breach of
RB-198	SOGA S.11(2)	warranty - breach of

* SOGA = Sale of Goods Act 1895 (Western Australia)

related articles:  business index  contract law: summary  contract law: caselaw index