subject: Hackers Clone E-Passports
posted: Sat, 05 Aug 2006 12:52:26 +0100


[see also: http://www.securityfocus.com/brief/272 - Stu]

http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,71521-
0.html?tw=rss.index&WT.svl=bestoftheweb3

Hackers Clone E-Passports

See Also

* The RFID Hacking Underground
* Fatal Flaw Weakens RFID Passports
* Lawmaker Rips RFID Passport Plans
* Feds Rethinking RFID Passport
* Passport Chip Criticism Grows
* American Passports to Get Chipped


By Kim Zetter
02:00 AM Aug, 03, 2006

LAS VEGAS -- A German computer security consultant has shown that he
can clone the electronic passports that the United States and other
countries are beginning to dist ributethisyear.

The controversial e-passports contain radio frequency ID, or RFID,
chips that the U.S. State Department and others say will help thwart
document forgery. But Lukas Grunwald, a security consultant with DN-
Systems in Germany and an RFID expert, says the data in the chips is
easy to copy.

"The whole passport design is totally brain damaged," Grunwald says.
"From my point of view all of these RFID passports are a huge waste
of money. They're not increasing security at all."

Grunwald plans to demonstrate the cloning technique Thursday at the
Black Hat security conference in Las Vegas.

The United States has led the charge for global e-passports because
authorities say the chip, which is digitally signed by the issuing
country, will help them distinguish between official documents and
forged ones. The United States plans to begin issuing e-passports to
U.S. citizens beginning in Octob er.Germanyhasalreadystarted
issuing the documents.

Although countries have talked about encrypting data that's stored on
passport chips, this would require that a complicated infrastructure
be built first, so currently the data is not encrypted.

"And of course if you can read the data, you can clone the data and
put it in a new tag," Grunwald says.

The cloning news is confirmation for many e-passport critics that
RFID chips won't make the documents more secure.

"Either this guy is incredible or this technology is unbelievably
stupid," says Gus Hosein, a visiting fellow in information systems at
the London School of Economics and Political Science and senior
fellow at Privacy International, a U.K.-based group that opposes the
use of RFID chips in passports.

"I think it's a combination of the two," Hosein says. "Is this what
the best and the brightest of the world could come up with? Or is
this what happens when you do policy laundering and you get a bunch
of bureaucrats making decisions about technologies they don't
understand?"

Grunwald says it took him only two weeks to figure out how to clone
the passport chip. Most of that time he spent reading the standards
for e-passports that are posted on a website for the International
Civil Aviation Organization, a United Nations body that developed the
standard. He tested the attack on a new European Union German
passport, but the method would work on any country's e-passport,
since all of them will be adhering to the same ICAO standard.

In a demonstration for Wired News, Grunwald placed his passport on
top of an official passport-inspection RFID reader used for border
control. He obtained the reader by ordering it from the maker --
Walluf, Germany-based ACG Identification Technologies -- but says
someone could easily make their own for about $200 just by adding an
antenna to a standard RFID reader.

He then launched a program that border patrol stations use to read
the passports -- called Golden Reader Tool and made by secunet
Security Networks -- and within four seconds, the data from the
passport chip appeared on screen in the Golden Reader template.

Grunwald then prepared a sample blank passport page embedded with an
RFID tag by placing it on the reader -- which can also act as a
writer -- and burning in the ICAO layout, so that the basic structure
of the chip matched that of an official passport.

As the final step, he used a program that he and a partner designed
two years ago, called RFDump, to program the new chip with the copied
information.

The result was a blank document that looks, to electronic passport
readers, like the original passport.

Although he can clone the tag, Grunwald says it's not possible, as
far as he can tell, to change data on the chip, such as the name or
birth date, without being detected. That's because the passport uses
cryptographic hashes to authenticate the data.

When he was done, he went on to clone the same passport data onto an
ordinary smartcard -- such as the kind used by corporations for
access keys -- after formatting the card's chip to the ICAO standard.
He then showed how he could trick a reader into reading the cloned
chip instead of a passport chip by placing the smartcard inside the
passport between the reader and the passport chip. Because the reader
is designed to read only one chip at a time, it read the chip nearest
to it -- in the smartcard -- rather than the one embedded in the
passport.

The demonstration means a terrorist whose name is on a watch list
could carry a passport with his real name and photo printed on the
pages, but with an RFID chip that contains different information
cloned from someone else's passport. Any border-screening computers
that rely on the electronic information -- instead of what's printed
on the passport -- would wind up checking the wrong name.

Grunwald acknowledges, however, that such a plot could be easily
thwarted by a screener who physically examines the passport to make
sure the name and picture printed on it match the data read from the
chip. Machine-readable OCR text printed at the bottom of the passport
would also fail to match the RFID data.

Frank Moss, deputy assistant secretary of state for passport services
at the State Department, says that designers of the e-passport have
long known that the chips can be cloned and that other security
safeguards in the passport design -- such as a digital photograph of
the passport holder embedded in the data page -- would still prevent
someone from using a forged or modified passport to gain entry into
the United States and other countries.

"What this person has done is neither unexpected nor really all that
remarkable," Moss says. "(T)he chip is not in and of itself a silver
bullet.... It's an additional means of verifying that the person who
is carrying the passport is the person to whom that passport was
issued by the relevant government."

Moss also said that the United States has no plans to use fully
automated inspection systems; therefore, a physical inspection of the
passport against the data stored on the RFID chip would catch any
discrepancies between the two.

There are other countries, however, that are considering taking human
inspectors out of the loop. Australia, for one, has talked about
using automated passport inspection for selected groups of travelers,
Moss says.

In addition to the danger of counterfeiting, Grunwald says that the
ability to tamper with e-passports opens up the possibility that
someone could write corrupt data to the passport RFID tag that would
crash an unprepared inspection system, or even introduce malicious
code into the backend border-screening computers. This would work,
however, only if the backend system suffers from the kind of built-in
software vulnerabilities that have made other systems so receptive to
viruses and Trojan-horse attacks.

"I want to say to people that if you're using RFID passports, then
please make it secure," Grunwald says. "This is in your own interest
and it's also in my interest. If you think about cyberterrorists and
nasty, black-hat type of guys, it's a high risk.... From my point of
view, it should not be possible to clone the passport at all."

Hosein agrees. "Is this going to be the massive flaw that makes the
whole house of cards fall apart? Probably not. But I'm not entirely
sure how confident we should feel about these new passports."

Grunwald's technique requires a counterfeiter to have physical
possession of the original passport for a time. A forger could not
surreptitiously clone a passport in a traveler's pocket or purse
because of a built-in privacy feature called Basic Access Control
that requires officials to unlock a passport's RFID chip before
reading it. The chip can only be unlocked with a unique key derived
from the machine-readable data printed on the passport's page.

To produce a clone, Grunwald has to program his copycat chip to
answer to the key printed on the new passport. Alternatively, he can
program the clone to dispense with Basic Access Control, which is an
optional feature in the specification.

Grunwald's isn't the only research on e-passport problems circulating
at Black Hat. Kevin Mahaffey and John Hering of Flexilis released a
video Wednesday demonstrating that a privacy feature slated for the
new passports may not work as designed.

As planned, U.S. e-passports will contain a web of metal fiber
embedded in the front cover of the documents to shield them from
unauthorized readers. Though Basic Access Control would keep the chip
from yielding useful information to attackers, it would still
announce its presence to anyone with the right equipment. The
government added the shielding after privacy activists expressed
worries that a terrorist could simply point a reader at a crowd and
identify foreign travelers.

In theory, with metal fibers in the front cover, nobody can sniff out
the presence of an e-passport that's closed. But Mahaffey and Hering
demonstrated in their video how even if a passport opens only half an
inch -- such as it might if placed in a purse or backpack -- it can
reveal itself to a reader at least two feet away.

Using a mockup e-passport modeled on the U.S. design, they showed how
an attacker could connect a hidden, improvised bomb to a reader such
that it triggers an explosion when a passport-holder comes within
range.

In addition to cloning passport chips, Grunwald has been able to
clone RFID ticket cards used by students at universities to buy
cafeteria meals and add money to the balance on the cards.

He and his partners were also able to crash RFID-enabled alarm
systems designed to sound when an intruder breaks a window or door to
gain entry. Such systems require workers to pass an RFID card over a
reader to turn the system on and off. Grunwald found that by
manipulating data on the RFID chip he could crash the system, opening
the way for a thief to break into the building through a window or
door.

And they were able to clone and manipulate RFID tags used in hotel
room key cards and corporate access cards and create a master key
card to open every room in a hotel, office or other facility. He was
able, for example, to clone Mifare, the most commonly used key-access
system, designed by Philips Electronics. To create a master key he
simply needed two or three key cards for different rooms to determine
the structure of the cards. Of the 10 different types of RFID systems
he examined that were being used in hotels, none used encryption.

Many of the card systems that did use encryption failed to change the
default key that manufacturers program into the access card system
before shipping, or they used sample keys that the manufacturer
includes in instructions sent with the cards. Grunwald and his
partners created a dictionary database of all the sample keys they
found in such literature (much of which they found accidentally
published on purchasers' websites) to conduct what's known as a
dictionary attack. When attacking a new access card system, their
RFDump program would search the list until it found the key that
unlocked a card's encryption.

"I was really surprised we were able to open about 75 percent of all
the cards we collected," he says.


Wired.com © 2006 CondéNet Inc. All rights reserved.


---
* Origin: [adminz] tech, security, support -
http://cyberdelix.net/adminz/

generated by msg2page 0.06 on Aug 7, 2006 at 10:41:53