subject: (Fwd) Re: port scans
posted: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 22:38:39 +0100



------- Forwarded message follows -------
Priority: normal
Date sent: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 15:36:07 -0300
Send reply to: [email protected]
From: Rick Ballard <[email protected]>
Organization: xwave solutions
Subject: Re: Interesting reply
To: [email protected]

On 27 Sep 2000, at 2:55, H Carvey wrote:

> Nothing personal to anyone...but if you've got time to
> report every little port scan that you get (call it
> what you will...scan, probe, whatever...) then you've
> got a LOT of time on your hands!
>
> After reading this list, and others on SF...I still
> fail to see why so many folks are reporting port
> scans, expecting the folks at ISPs to "do something"
> about them. First off...port scans, in and of
> themselves, are nothing more than a minor annoyance at
> best (insert appropriate analogy here). If a scan
> reaches a level that it's consuming an inordinate
> amount of bandwidth, then it ceases to be a scan and
> becomes a DoS attack.

A large percentage of port scans come from compromised hosts or
trojan infected hosts. In these cases, I am sure the sysadmin at the
source site would like to know about it. If the scan comes from a
dialup, then it is probably a script kiddie, but if it comes from a
well known company site, it is almost certain to be a compromised or
trojanned host and should be reported. Of course the compromised host
was probably broken into by a script kiddie who had previously done a
scan from his dialup host.

--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Rick Ballard Cell : 902-483-0559 xwave solutions Pager :
902-458-6568 Halifax,Nova Scotia Email : [email protected]
Canada Timezone: Atlantic AST(GMT-4)/ADT(GMT-3)


------- End of forwarded message -------

generated by msg2page 0.06 on Jul 21, 2006 at 19:05:08

 search: